My point about EU research priorities on large turbines projects, in particular the EURE project, seems to have been misunderstood (Letters, More on Research, November 1996). As I understand it, the aim of this project is to prove the viability of the large turbine concept through a feasibility study. But the EU has already supported the development of large turbines via, for example, the WEGA-II project. Today a collection of turbines powered at more than 750 kW are considered commercial and are already operating in wind farms to prove the point. My argument is against spending money on proving the viability of such machines when we can see they are viable today. Is it necessary to fund a research project to prove a concept that only needs the confirmation of operational experience?
Leading business intelligence for the wind community.
- In-depth news, analysis, market insight and trends.
- Join today and get your first 30 days free
Tech that has more commonly been used to monitor damage to structures such as bridges is now coming to the fore in the wind industry as a more efficient way to detect blades that have been compromised
No wind farm or operator is the same. That’s why Winergy offers turbine-ready service solutions
Keynote speaker at Blades USA 2022 – David Kaskie, vice president of Products & Systemsdivision, MISTRAS Group – on the importance of getting creative.
How a continuous monitoring solution from Ping is helping turbine owners and providers of predictive analytics minimise blade O&M costs