Blade Operations And Maintenance Forum

Forum Day One - Tuesday 1 November 2016
08:30

Registration And Refreshments 

09:00

Chair's Opening Remarks 

Scott Abramson, Director Of Operational Excellence, Duke Energy 

09:10

KEYNOTE

Time For A Reality Check: Why The Wind Industry Needs To Give Blades The Attention They Deserve

  • Impact of blade performance on AEP 
  • Costs of maintaining blades and reflection on OPEX
  • Challenges of accessing blades and fit for purpose solutions currently on the market 

  • Quick alternatives to compensate for delays from OEMs 

  • The commitment of OEMs: 
    • How do they plan to eliminate root cause problems?

    • Design: what do they have in mind for the future? 

    • Add-on solutions to extend the lifetime of the blades 

Scott Abramson, Director Of Operational Excellence, Duke Energy 

THE LATEST INSPECTION METHODS TO REDUCE COSTS AND ENHANCE BLADE PERFORMANCE   

09:30

Creating The Link: A Case Study Comparing Ground Based And On Blade Inspections

  • The challenge of linking two distinct damage and repair classification systems
  • Introduction of the "confidence level" of defect identification 
  • How do we aggregate these data to reveal trends over time, along the blade span, across a wind farm, and across multiple sites?

Nigel Swytink-Binnema,   Research Analyst,  Technocentre éolien

10:00

Protecting Blades By Using Standardized Lightning Protection Systems

  • Why is lightning physics important for determining striking points?
  • What are the new developments in lightning protection?
  • Advantages of using premanufactured lightning protection solutions
  • Definition of lifetime on lightning protection systems
  • Updated IEC standards on lightning protection
  • Improving existing blade with new technology
Kim Bertelsen, CEO Founder And Owner, Global Lightning Protection Services A/S
10:30

Networking Break And Morning Refreshments 

11:00

Keep It Simple: The Way Towards A Solution To Leading Edge Protection

  • From idea to reality
  • Why join forces and potentially limit your capacity?
  • What to do about the PR confusion?
  • Where do we go next?

Rikke Bergmann Johansen, Business Developer, Skagen Blade Technology

11:30  

The Current And Future Potential Of Drones In Maximizing Data And Asset Management Practices

  • Where is FAA currently standing on the use of drones for inspections?
  • What is the ROI?
  • How can the software integrated in the drone, help with inspection data processing and management?
  • Effectively using UAV inspections to track faults and damages in your fleet 
  • Integrating drone with ground-based techniques for the perfect inspection mix
Andre Moura, CEO, Pro-Drone 
12:00 

Networking Lunch 

13:00 

HIGH FREQUENCY TALKS 

To What Extent Are Drones A Viable Commercial Solution To Inspect Blades?

The aim of these high frequency talks is to facilitate a discussion on how drones can contribute to blade inspection as well as how the former, when integrated with a data acquisition and categorization software, could truly have an impact on the way damages are being analyzed, monitored and managed today. 

Each delegate will be given the chance to express their thoughts, concerns, ideas and solutions anonymously and in written form (5 minutes) through an online platform called Sli.do. The moderator will then read out  the audience’s suggestions on how the industry can progress on these issues. The debate will then be opened up to the rest of the room, making this the perfect occasion to take a real step forward and overcome the barriers of using drones. 

DAMAGES: STANDARDIZATION AND CATEGORIZATION ADVANCEMENTS

13:30

Using  Data and Engineering Principles To Implement Effective Standardization Measures 

  • How to achieve blade's lifetime extension
  • Using manufacturing, environmental and operation data to determine failure modes
  • Modeling blade repairs allows engineering principles to be analyzed before implementation
  • Achieving repair standardization for common failures
Gary Kanaby, Commercial Manager, WindCom 
14:00 

PANEL DISCUSSION

What Is The Best Approach To Categorizing, Standardizing And Prioritizing Damages? 

  • Why the approach “fit and forget” is no longer acceptable
  • Are the current categorization methods sufficient to meet the wind farm operator’s needs?
  • If each damage is different from another, how should wind farm operators carry out their O&M activities, and subsequently plan their actions? 
  • What are the pros and cons of creating a standardized industry method to categorize and prioritize damages?
  • What should you do with the pictures received? 

Participants include:

Carsten Hein Westergaard, Senior Advisor, Wind And Water Technologies, Sandia National Laboratories

Robert Gallaher, Structural Engineer, NextEra Energy 

Thomas Schmidt, Engineer Blade Service,  Nordex 

Kelly Miller,  Project Manager O&M, EDF RS

15:00

Networking Break And Afternoon Refreshments 

15:30 

From Damage Categorization To Qualification And Optimization Of Repair Methods

  • Introduction to damage categorization from an OEM's perspective
  • Specification of assessment criteria and definition of constraints
  • Identification of potential demands for qualification and optimization of repair methods

Thomas Schmidt, Engineer Blade Service, Nordex 

16:00 

Roundtable Discussions

Delegates will select one of the following peer-to-peer discussions from the strategic or technical streams listed below. You will move into small break-out groups where discussions will be off the record and led by an expert on the given topic. Delegates are encouraged to bring along their considered ideas and questions in order to facilitate a meaningful and in-depth discussion. 

1. Inspections: what would be your perfect O&M activity mix? 

Santhosh Krishna Chandrabalan,  Global Business Manager - Wind Energy,  3M 

2.  How to ascertain if a fault is a priority and avoid unnecessary money loss

Jeff Elberling,   Mechanical Engineer,   Siemens

3.  Larger and longer blades: what does this mean for transportation and are jointed blades a possibility?

Jian Lahir,  Turbine Reliability Engineer - Blades,  EDPR 

4.  Do we truly understand CMS? 

Daniel Molyneux,  Blades Manager,  Vestas 

17:00

Roundtable Feedback

Delegates return to the main plenary room to hear the discussion leaders sharing the main outcomes of their discussions. 

17:30

Chair's Closing Remarks

17:45

Wind Down With Some Drinks 

19:00

Networking dinner